<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bitter Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html</link>
	<description>Programming is passion made real</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPT</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>JPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html#comment-98</guid>
		<description>This more or less is my opinion. I hate it. I have to use Java at my job. And I had to realize most Java developers did not understand OOP. In my opinion, it is possible to write &quot;good&quot; software in Java, but there are far better languages. I am from the pascal world. So what I really want to try is http://www.remobjects.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This more or less is my opinion. I hate it. I have to use Java at my job. And I had to realize most Java developers did not understand OOP. In my opinion, it is possible to write &#8220;good&#8221; software in Java, but there are far better languages. I am from the pascal world. So what I really want to try is <a href="http://www.remobjects.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.remobjects.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I liked it too, until I tried Python.  Nothing comes close.  I agree though, of the languages you listed, Java is far and away better and more fun to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked it too, until I tried Python.  Nothing comes close.  I agree though, of the languages you listed, Java is far and away better and more fun to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Risser</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Risser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2006/bitter-java.html#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I enjoyed reading your opinions, but I sure do like programming in Java- so much that I do it at home as well as at work.  It&#039;s an awesome toolbox for creating any kind of application!  I&#039;ve used C, C++, Pascal, assemblers, and some other languages, but nothing even comes close to Java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I enjoyed reading your opinions, but I sure do like programming in Java- so much that I do it at home as well as at work.  It&#8217;s an awesome toolbox for creating any kind of application!  I&#8217;ve used C, C++, Pascal, assemblers, and some other languages, but nothing even comes close to Java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

