<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mootools beats jQuery and Ext for AIR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html</link>
	<description>Stuff that catches a Passionate Programmer's Eye</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonah Dempcy</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/comment-page-1#comment-58208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah Dempcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html#comment-58208</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t experimented with AIR yet but I am curious to try it out. As for libraries, I have 1 year production experience using Prototype/Scriptaculous and while it made some things easier, also had a fair amount of cumbersome boilerplate code, annoying quirks and peculiarities with the OO inheritance. I&#039;ve heard that much of this has been fixed in newer versions (I was using 1.5) but this experience led me to investigate alternative solutions, eventually choosing MooTools and using that for a number of projects. It&#039;s great to hear that MooTools works out-of-the-box with AIR. It&#039;s a very clean, well-thought-out library so I can&#039;t say that surprises me.

I can&#039;t speak for Ext or the others as I don&#039;t have much experience with them. I&#039;ve used a bit of jQuery and it has a very succinct syntax that I like, but in terms of reading the actual source code, MooTools is the only library where I have truly delved into the implementation details and actually been able to get a good grasp of what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t experimented with AIR yet but I am curious to try it out. As for libraries, I have 1 year production experience using Prototype/Scriptaculous and while it made some things easier, also had a fair amount of cumbersome boilerplate code, annoying quirks and peculiarities with the OO inheritance. I&#8217;ve heard that much of this has been fixed in newer versions (I was using 1.5) but this experience led me to investigate alternative solutions, eventually choosing MooTools and using that for a number of projects. It&#8217;s great to hear that MooTools works out-of-the-box with AIR. It&#8217;s a very clean, well-thought-out library so I can&#8217;t say that surprises me.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak for Ext or the others as I don&#8217;t have much experience with them. I&#8217;ve used a bit of jQuery and it has a very succinct syntax that I like, but in terms of reading the actual source code, MooTools is the only library where I have truly delved into the implementation details and actually been able to get a good grasp of what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MooTools + AIR = Love &#171; Flash Enabled - Get Ready With Flash&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/comment-page-1#comment-40178</link>
		<dc:creator>MooTools + AIR = Love &#171; Flash Enabled - Get Ready With Flash&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html#comment-40178</guid>
		<description>[...] Read More Here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More Here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaScript Classes Comparison &#187; Self Study Reference Center</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/comment-page-1#comment-28527</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaScript Classes Comparison &#187; Self Study Reference Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html#comment-28527</guid>
		<description>[...] is also other posts tell something about:  Mootools beats jQuery and Ext for AIR jQuery vs. Prototype: OO JavaScript with or without training wheels 3 reasons why I use jQuery  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is also other posts tell something about:  Mootools beats jQuery and Ext for AIR jQuery vs. Prototype: OO JavaScript with or without training wheels 3 reasons why I use jQuery  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napyfab:blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-31</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/comment-page-1#comment-22105</link>
		<dc:creator>napyfab:blog&#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-10-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html#comment-22105</guid>
		<description>[...] Mootools beats jQuery and Ext for AIR (tags: mootools air javascript jquery webdesign webdev web development framework) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mootools beats jQuery and Ext for AIR (tags: mootools air javascript jquery webdesign webdev web development framework) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rey Bango</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/comment-page-1#comment-21993</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey Bango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html#comment-21993</guid>
		<description>Hey Bruce. Sorry you&#039;re having issues. Ext and Adobe have a great relationship and we&#039;re (Ext) addressing these issues with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bruce. Sorry you&#8217;re having issues. Ext and Adobe have a great relationship and we&#8217;re (Ext) addressing these issues with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kramer</title>
		<link>http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html/comment-page-1#comment-21966</link>
		<dc:creator>kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderseye.com/2007/mootools-beats-jquery-and-ext-for-air.html#comment-21966</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip, i was previously using an autocomplete with jquery and once beta 2 came out it killed it. Even when i followed the security settings it had a problem because the autocomplete used an iframe (which was already inside one for security). With the switch to mootools it&#039;s working great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, i was previously using an autocomplete with jquery and once beta 2 came out it killed it. Even when i followed the security settings it had a problem because the autocomplete used an iframe (which was already inside one for security). With the switch to mootools it&#8217;s working great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->